<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TV on the Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.lolight.com/2010/01/05/tv-on-the-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.lolight.com/2010/01/05/tv-on-the-web/</link>
	<description>Yet another design blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 20:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stephen B.</title>
		<link>http://blog.lolight.com/2010/01/05/tv-on-the-web/#comment-12672</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lolight.com/?p=59#comment-12672</guid>
		<description>I guess that the debate goes both ways.   I did discover a few shows on HULU and in some ways it could make me really want to buy the DVD.  Or else I will find a show loses my interest (most do) and I'm glad I had a chance to screen the stuff first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess that the debate goes both ways.   I did discover a few shows on HULU and in some ways it could make me really want to buy the DVD.  Or else I will find a show loses my interest (most do) and I&#8217;m glad I had a chance to screen the stuff first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
